Files
cgal/Number_types
Sylvain Pion 1df108c0d7 Replace some CGAL_assertion(A && B) by CGAL_assertion(A & B).
In general this is safe: B would not be evaluated only if A would be false,
  that is, when the assertion would be raised anyway.  So what worse can happen
  in evaluating B than an assertion failure.  Not much I guess.
  And for Uncertain<> conditions, it is preferable to use & instead of &&.
  So I change some of these to see if it might become a global rule.
2008-08-12 14:59:20 +00:00
..