Allows us to use the built-in suffix rules where appropriate.
FORTRAN -> FC (POSIX)
OPTS -> FFLAGS (POSIX)
DRVOPTS -> FFLAGS_DRV
NOOPT -> FFLAGS_NOOPT
LOADER -> FC (use the compiler driver for linking)
LOADOPTS -> LDFLAGS (POSIX)
ARCH -> AR (POSIX)
ARCHFLAGS -> ARFLAGS (POSIX)
This commit is purely of cleaning up missing externals. Currently there
is no check on EXTERNAL's not used.
Signed-off-by: Nick Papior <nickpapior@gmail.com>
cleanobj: Remove object files
cleanlib: Remove libraries
cleanexe: Remove test and example executables
cleantest: Remove test output and core dumps
clean: All of the above
This is really old school, but a lot of times we have users sending us
copy pasting of codes, and that is the only way to know the version of
the code.
Ancient versions of CMake required else(), endif(), and similar block
termination commands to have arguments matching the command starting the
block. This is no longer the preferred style.
NOTE: MUST USE GNU compliant version of sed
Run the following shell code:
for c in else endif endforeach endfunction endmacro endwhile; do
echo 's/\b'"$c"'\(\s*\)(.\+)/'"$c"'\1()/'
done >convert.sed \
&& git ls-files -z -- bootstrap '*.cmake' '*.cmake.in' '*CMakeLists.txt' \
| xargs -0 gsed -i -f convert.sed \
&& rm convert.sed
This is mostly a long term maintenance improvement.
Many coding styles require elimination of trailing whitespace, and
many editors and source code management configurations automatically
gobble up whitespace. When these tools gobble up whitespace, it
complicates reviewing the meaningful code changes.
By removing whitespace on one patch, it makes future
code reviews much easier.
=SCRIPT====================================================================
if which tempfile &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=tempfile
elif which mktemp &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=mktemp
else
echo "Cannot find tempfile program." 2>&1
exit 1
fi
MYTEMP=$($TEMPMAKER)
trap 'rm -f $MYTEMP' SIGINT SIGTERM
stripit() {
echo "stripping $1"
sed 's/[ \t]*$//' "$1" > $MYTEMP
cp $MYTEMP "$1"
}
if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
while [ "$1" != "" ]; do
stripit $1
shift
done
else
while read -t 2; do
stripit $REPLY
done
fi
rm $MYTEMP
=================================================
This is mostly a long term maintenance improvement.
Many coding styles require elimination of trailing whitespace, and
many editors and source code management configurations automatically
gobble up whitespace. When these tools gobble up whitespace, it
complicates reviewing the meaningful code changes.
By removing whitespace on one patch, it makes future
code reviews much easier.
=SCRIPT====================================================================
if which tempfile &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=tempfile
elif which mktemp &>/dev/null; then
TEMPMAKER=mktemp
else
echo "Cannot find tempfile program." 2>&1
exit 1
fi
MYTEMP=$($TEMPMAKER)
trap 'rm -f $MYTEMP' SIGINT SIGTERM
stripit() {
echo "stripping $1"
sed 's/[ \t]*$//' "$1" > $MYTEMP
cp $MYTEMP "$1"
}
if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
while [ "$1" != "" ]; do
stripit $1
shift
done
else
while read -t 2; do
stripit $REPLY
done
fi
rm $MYTEMP
=================================================
This is mostly a long term maintenance improvement.
Many coding styles require elimination of trailing whitespace, and
many editors and source code management configurations automatically
gobble up whitespace. When these tools gobble up whitespace, it
complicates reviewing the meaningful code changes.
By removing whitespace on one patch, it makes future
code reviews much easier.
Use \par instead of \details for section.
add a Contributors Section and a Reference Section.
Remove (some) verbatim section when not needed.
Those changes have been done by hand so I am not sure I manage to catch them all.
The following variables will control the precision to be built:
BUILD_SINGLE
BUILD_DOUBLE
BUILD_COMPLEX
BUILD_COMPLEX16
For mixed precision SINGLE/DOUBLE routines, both BUILD_SINGLE and BUILD_DOUBLE needs to be on.
(same for COMPLEX/COMPLEX16)
Incorporate OLD Testings from ACM Collected algorithms : algorithm 539
for:
- DROTMG/SROTMG
- DROTM/SROTM
- DSDOT / SDSDOT
All BLAS routines are now tested.
Now up to us to change the BLAS but at least this is consistent.
Angelika Schwarz