Use \par instead of \details for section.
add a Contributors Section and a Reference Section.
Remove (some) verbatim section when not needed.
Those changes have been done by hand so I am not sure I manage to catch them all.
Email sent on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:53:57 to lapack@cs.utk.edu.
I think we have a bug in dstemr.f for the case when N is 2. The following
block:
392: IF (CS.NE.ZERO) THEN
393: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
394: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 2
395: ELSE
396: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
397: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
398: END IF
should really be (note lines 394, 397):
392: IF (CS.NE.ZERO) THEN
393: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
394: ISUPPZ(2*M) = 2
395: ELSE
396: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
397: ISUPPZ(2*M) = 1
398: END IF
similarly the block:
415: IF (SN.NE.ZERO) THEN
416: IF (CS.NE.ZERO) THEN
417: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
418: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 2
419: ELSE
420: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
421: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
422: END IF
423: ELSE
should really be (note lines 418, 421):
415: IF (SN.NE.ZERO) THEN
416: IF (CS.NE.ZERO) THEN
417: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
418: ISUPPZ(2*M) = 2
419: ELSE
420: ISUPPZ(2*M-1) = 1
421: ISUPPZ(2*M) = 1
422: END IF
423: ELSE
https://jason@icl.cs.utk.edu/svn/lapack-dev/lapack/branches/SC08-release
........
r609 | julie | 2008-12-16 17:17:52 -0500 (Tue, 16 Dec 2008) | 1 line
Polish routines to fit the LAPACK framework and allow manpages generation
........
r610 | langou | 2008-12-19 12:12:38 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 30 lines
bug reported on the forum
https://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=854
the complete thread is available at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93#
Tobias Burnus also sent us an email:
> Hello,
>
> this was reported at
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93#
>
> The problem is the line 47:
>
> 47: IF( M.EQ.0 .OR. A(M, 1).NE.ZERO .OR. A(M, N).NE.ZERO ) THEN
>
> If M == 0 the one accesses A(0,1) which is invalid as the lower bound is 1
> and not 0.
>
> Note: Contrary to C there is no left-to-right evaluation of expressions in
> Fortran; the order is left to the compiler. One might assume that a smart
> compiler does not evaluate "A(M,1)" if "M==0", however, there is nothing in
> the standard guarantees this.
>
> If bounds checks are turned on (see post at the URL above), gfortran aborts
> with an out-of-bounds error.
........
r611 | julie | 2008-12-19 15:00:58 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 5 lines
Modify the formatting of the comments.
Replace Note and Notes section by Further Details
This allow the manpages to be generated corectly.
........
r612 | julie | 2008-12-19 16:29:21 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 3 lines
Reformat the xblas routines comments to be able to generate the manpages
........
r613 | julie | 2008-12-19 16:30:31 -0500 (Fri, 19 Dec 2008) | 1 line
Update version number
........
r614 | jason | 2008-12-27 09:44:45 -0500 (Sat, 27 Dec 2008) | 13 lines
Fix non-short-circuited tests in ILAxL{C,R}.
Fortran doesn't short-circuit logical operators, so the check that the leading
dimension /= 0 may not prevent indexing into a 0-length array.
Reported by "hes selex" in
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/635192e11beadb93
and forwarded to the LAPACK maintainers by Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>.
Chalk up more bugs found by gfortran's diagnostics!
Signed-off-by: Jason Riedy <ejr@cs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
........
julie