Remove some debug output we don't need anymore.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -371,42 +371,6 @@ node->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "r16954c" << node->Count() << " now scb " <<
|
||||
//node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << " and lscb " <<
|
||||
//node->Stat().LastSecondClosestBound() << ".\n";
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "Update second closest bound for r16954c" <<
|
||||
//node->Count() << " to " << node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << ", which could "
|
||||
// << "have been parent's (" << node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestBound()
|
||||
//<< ") or adjusted last iteration's (" << node->Stat().LastSecondClosestBound()
|
||||
//<< ").\n";
|
||||
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "r16954c" << node->Count() << " has second bound " <<
|
||||
//node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << " (q" << ((TreeType*)
|
||||
//node->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())->Begin() << "c" << ((TreeType*)
|
||||
//node->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())->Count() << ") and parent has second "
|
||||
// << "bound " << node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << " (q"
|
||||
// << ((TreeType*)
|
||||
//node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())->Begin() << "c" << ((TreeType*)
|
||||
//node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())->Count() << ").\n";
|
||||
/*
|
||||
if (node->Parent() != NULL &&
|
||||
node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode() != NULL &&
|
||||
node->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode() != NULL && !IsDescendantOf(*((TreeType*)
|
||||
node->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode()), *((TreeType*)
|
||||
node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestQueryNode())) &&
|
||||
node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestBound() < node->Stat().SecondClosestBound())
|
||||
{
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "Take second closest bound for r16954c" <<
|
||||
//node->Count() << " from parent: " << node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestBound()
|
||||
//<< " (was " << node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << ").\n";
|
||||
node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() =
|
||||
node->Parent()->Stat().SecondClosestBound();
|
||||
}*/
|
||||
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "Attempt Hamerly prune on r16954c" << node->Count() <<
|
||||
@@ -464,19 +428,6 @@ node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << " is too loose! -- " << secondClosestDist
|
||||
// No Hamerly prune, so we don't have a known owner.
|
||||
node->Stat().Owner() = clusters;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// else
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "Failed Hamerly prune for r" << node->Begin() << "c" <<
|
||||
// node->Count() << "; mqnd " << node->Stat().MaxQueryNodeDistance() <<
|
||||
// ", scb " << node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << ".\n";
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
// if (node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() == DBL_MAX)
|
||||
// {
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "r" << node->Begin() << "c" << node->Count() << " never had "
|
||||
// << "the second bound updated.\n";
|
||||
// }
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -500,14 +451,9 @@ node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << " is too loose! -- " << secondClosestDist
|
||||
// be rebuilt.
|
||||
node->Stat().ClosestQueryNode() = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
// if (node->Begin() == 16954)
|
||||
// Log::Warn << "scb for r16954c" << node->Count() << " updated to " <<
|
||||
//node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() << ".\n";
|
||||
|
||||
// if (!node->Stat().HamerlyPruned())
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < node->NumChildren(); ++i)
|
||||
TreeUpdate(&node->Child(i), clusters, clusterDistances, assignments,
|
||||
centroids, dataset, oldFromNew, hamerlyPruned);
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < node->NumChildren(); ++i)
|
||||
TreeUpdate(&node->Child(i), clusters, clusterDistances, assignments,
|
||||
centroids, dataset, oldFromNew, hamerlyPruned);
|
||||
|
||||
node->Stat().LastSecondClosestBound() = node->Stat().SecondClosestBound() -
|
||||
clusterDistances[clusters];
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user