Files
mfem/examples/ex3.cpp
T
Veselin Dobrev da2fb88a17 Improved uniform refinement of tetrahedral meshes
In class Mesh/ParMesh:
  * Move the serial implementation of UniformRefinement3D to a new
    method: UniformRefinement3D_base. The implementations of the virtual
    method UniformRefinement3D (which now have no parameters) use the
    new UniformRefinement3D_base method.
  * In UniformRefinement3D_base, implemented two algorithms for choosing
    how to split the middle octahedron when refining a tetrahedron by
    cutting off its four corner tets. (These four tets have the same
    shape as the original tet and half the edge-length.) The choice of
    the algorithm is hard-coded in a const variable for now.
  * Add an optional parameter to UniformRefinement which is used to
    choose how to refine tet-only meshes: the default choice is to use
    the new algorithm defined by UniformRefinement3D; the second option
    is to use the old default - call LocalRefinement (marking all
    elements) to perform 3 levels of bisection. The new algorithm
    always produces elements with better shape (aspect ratio) than the
    old default (at least for the meshes in the data/ directory and a
    few other meshes).
  * Make the method Finalize virtual - its implementation in parallel
    requires updates in the ParMesh data.
  * Add a consistency check in ParMesh::ReorientTetMesh that verifies
    the assumption made in the method about the update of the shared
    triangles.
  * Simplify implementation of some methods in class ParMesh by
    separating common code in a new protected method: FinalizeParTopo.

Other updates:
  * In the examples and miniapps, when using a tet-only mesh which is
    first refined uniformly and then locally, it is now necessary to
    call the method Mesh::Finalize(true) (which is now virtual) in order
    to mark the elements for local refinement after the uniform
    refinement.
  * In example 12p, use better random seed values.
  * In examples 3/3p, add a sample run with order=2 on a tet mesh - this
    will test the methods {Mesh,ParMesh}::ReorientTetMesh. Previously,
    these were only tested by one sample run in example 4p.
  * In the mesh-explorer miniapp, add a refinement option to perform
    uniform refinement of tet-only meshes using bisection.
  * In the MFEM_LOCATION macro print the <file> and <line> location
    using a standard format: <file>:<line>, as used by most compilers
    when reporting warnings and errors.
  * Remove FIXME comments about mesh format v1.0.1.
2018-09-27 21:04:58 -07:00

243 lines
8.4 KiB
C++

// MFEM Example 3
//
// Compile with: make ex3
//
// Sample runs: ex3 -m ../data/star.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/beam-tri.mesh -o 2
// ex3 -m ../data/beam-tet.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/beam-hex.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/escher.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/escher.mesh -o 2
// ex3 -m ../data/fichera.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/fichera-q2.vtk
// ex3 -m ../data/fichera-q3.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/square-disc-nurbs.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/beam-hex-nurbs.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/amr-hex.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/fichera-amr.mesh
// ex3 -m ../data/star-surf.mesh -o 1
// ex3 -m ../data/mobius-strip.mesh -f 0.1
// ex3 -m ../data/klein-bottle.mesh -f 0.1
//
// Description: This example code solves a simple electromagnetic diffusion
// problem corresponding to the second order definite Maxwell
// equation curl curl E + E = f with boundary condition
// E x n = <given tangential field>. Here, we use a given exact
// solution E and compute the corresponding r.h.s. f.
// We discretize with Nedelec finite elements in 2D or 3D.
//
// The example demonstrates the use of H(curl) finite element
// spaces with the curl-curl and the (vector finite element) mass
// bilinear form, as well as the computation of discretization
// error when the exact solution is known. Static condensation is
// also illustrated.
//
// We recommend viewing examples 1-2 before viewing this example.
#include "mfem.hpp"
#include <fstream>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
using namespace mfem;
// Exact solution, E, and r.h.s., f. See below for implementation.
void E_exact(const Vector &, Vector &);
void f_exact(const Vector &, Vector &);
double freq = 1.0, kappa;
int dim;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
// 1. Parse command-line options.
const char *mesh_file = "../data/beam-tet.mesh";
int order = 1;
bool static_cond = false;
bool visualization = 1;
OptionsParser args(argc, argv);
args.AddOption(&mesh_file, "-m", "--mesh",
"Mesh file to use.");
args.AddOption(&order, "-o", "--order",
"Finite element order (polynomial degree).");
args.AddOption(&freq, "-f", "--frequency", "Set the frequency for the exact"
" solution.");
args.AddOption(&static_cond, "-sc", "--static-condensation", "-no-sc",
"--no-static-condensation", "Enable static condensation.");
args.AddOption(&visualization, "-vis", "--visualization", "-no-vis",
"--no-visualization",
"Enable or disable GLVis visualization.");
args.Parse();
if (!args.Good())
{
args.PrintUsage(cout);
return 1;
}
args.PrintOptions(cout);
kappa = freq * M_PI;
// 2. Read the mesh from the given mesh file. We can handle triangular,
// quadrilateral, tetrahedral, hexahedral, surface and volume meshes with
// the same code.
Mesh *mesh = new Mesh(mesh_file, 1, 1);
dim = mesh->Dimension();
int sdim = mesh->SpaceDimension();
// 3. Refine the mesh to increase the resolution. In this example we do
// 'ref_levels' of uniform refinement. We choose 'ref_levels' to be the
// largest number that gives a final mesh with no more than 50,000
// elements.
{
int ref_levels =
(int)floor(log(50000./mesh->GetNE())/log(2.)/dim);
for (int l = 0; l < ref_levels; l++)
{
mesh->UniformRefinement();
}
}
mesh->ReorientTetMesh();
// 4. Define a finite element space on the mesh. Here we use the Nedelec
// finite elements of the specified order.
FiniteElementCollection *fec = new ND_FECollection(order, dim);
FiniteElementSpace *fespace = new FiniteElementSpace(mesh, fec);
cout << "Number of finite element unknowns: "
<< fespace->GetTrueVSize() << endl;
// 5. Determine the list of true (i.e. conforming) essential boundary dofs.
// In this example, the boundary conditions are defined by marking all
// the boundary attributes from the mesh as essential (Dirichlet) and
// converting them to a list of true dofs.
Array<int> ess_tdof_list;
if (mesh->bdr_attributes.Size())
{
Array<int> ess_bdr(mesh->bdr_attributes.Max());
ess_bdr = 1;
fespace->GetEssentialTrueDofs(ess_bdr, ess_tdof_list);
}
// 6. Set up the linear form b(.) which corresponds to the right-hand side
// of the FEM linear system, which in this case is (f,phi_i) where f is
// given by the function f_exact and phi_i are the basis functions in the
// finite element fespace.
VectorFunctionCoefficient f(sdim, f_exact);
LinearForm *b = new LinearForm(fespace);
b->AddDomainIntegrator(new VectorFEDomainLFIntegrator(f));
b->Assemble();
// 7. Define the solution vector x as a finite element grid function
// corresponding to fespace. Initialize x by projecting the exact
// solution. Note that only values from the boundary edges will be used
// when eliminating the non-homogeneous boundary condition to modify the
// r.h.s. vector b.
GridFunction x(fespace);
VectorFunctionCoefficient E(sdim, E_exact);
x.ProjectCoefficient(E);
// 8. Set up the bilinear form corresponding to the EM diffusion operator
// curl muinv curl + sigma I, by adding the curl-curl and the mass domain
// integrators.
Coefficient *muinv = new ConstantCoefficient(1.0);
Coefficient *sigma = new ConstantCoefficient(1.0);
BilinearForm *a = new BilinearForm(fespace);
a->AddDomainIntegrator(new CurlCurlIntegrator(*muinv));
a->AddDomainIntegrator(new VectorFEMassIntegrator(*sigma));
// 9. Assemble the bilinear form and the corresponding linear system,
// applying any necessary transformations such as: eliminating boundary
// conditions, applying conforming constraints for non-conforming AMR,
// static condensation, etc.
if (static_cond) { a->EnableStaticCondensation(); }
a->Assemble();
SparseMatrix A;
Vector B, X;
a->FormLinearSystem(ess_tdof_list, x, *b, A, X, B);
cout << "Size of linear system: " << A.Height() << endl;
#ifndef MFEM_USE_SUITESPARSE
// 10. Define a simple symmetric Gauss-Seidel preconditioner and use it to
// solve the system Ax=b with PCG.
GSSmoother M(A);
PCG(A, M, B, X, 1, 500, 1e-12, 0.0);
#else
// 10. If MFEM was compiled with SuiteSparse, use UMFPACK to solve the system.
UMFPackSolver umf_solver;
umf_solver.Control[UMFPACK_ORDERING] = UMFPACK_ORDERING_METIS;
umf_solver.SetOperator(A);
umf_solver.Mult(B, X);
#endif
// 11. Recover the solution as a finite element grid function.
a->RecoverFEMSolution(X, *b, x);
// 12. Compute and print the L^2 norm of the error.
cout << "\n|| E_h - E ||_{L^2} = " << x.ComputeL2Error(E) << '\n' << endl;
// 13. Save the refined mesh and the solution. This output can be viewed
// later using GLVis: "glvis -m refined.mesh -g sol.gf".
{
ofstream mesh_ofs("refined.mesh");
mesh_ofs.precision(8);
mesh->Print(mesh_ofs);
ofstream sol_ofs("sol.gf");
sol_ofs.precision(8);
x.Save(sol_ofs);
}
// 14. Send the solution by socket to a GLVis server.
if (visualization)
{
char vishost[] = "localhost";
int visport = 19916;
socketstream sol_sock(vishost, visport);
sol_sock.precision(8);
sol_sock << "solution\n" << *mesh << x << flush;
}
// 15. Free the used memory.
delete a;
delete sigma;
delete muinv;
delete b;
delete fespace;
delete fec;
delete mesh;
return 0;
}
void E_exact(const Vector &x, Vector &E)
{
if (dim == 3)
{
E(0) = sin(kappa * x(1));
E(1) = sin(kappa * x(2));
E(2) = sin(kappa * x(0));
}
else
{
E(0) = sin(kappa * x(1));
E(1) = sin(kappa * x(0));
if (x.Size() == 3) { E(2) = 0.0; }
}
}
void f_exact(const Vector &x, Vector &f)
{
if (dim == 3)
{
f(0) = (1. + kappa * kappa) * sin(kappa * x(1));
f(1) = (1. + kappa * kappa) * sin(kappa * x(2));
f(2) = (1. + kappa * kappa) * sin(kappa * x(0));
}
else
{
f(0) = (1. + kappa * kappa) * sin(kappa * x(1));
f(1) = (1. + kappa * kappa) * sin(kappa * x(0));
if (x.Size() == 3) { f(2) = 0.0; }
}
}